Literally, “philomythus” means “lover of myths”. But I guess that doesn’t really explain why I chose this for the name of my blog.
I have always been a big fan of C.S. Lewis, since reading the Chronicles of Narnia as a kid and Lewis’ apologetic titles later on. I also really liked J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings (the books before the movies…it’s interesting that both of these book series have recently spawned movie series so close to each other. I guess I’m not the only one to have found so much interest in the books). I had heard that there may have been some connection or acquaintance between Lewis and Tolkien, but I was never certain what that was. So to learn more about Lewis, I decided to read his biography, and ended up reading The Narnian by Alan Jacobs which is not a biography exactly, but more an understanding or explanation of Lewis’ development of thoughts and philosophies in his writings and specifically in the Chronicles of Narnia. After reading into Lewis’ university days, he does meetup with Tolkien, and it turns out that Tolkien was instrumental in Lewis becoming a Christian.
Anyways, so the specific reference is in a poem that Tolkien writes to Lewis titled Mythopoeia in which Tolkien calls himself “Philomythus” (“lover of myths”) and Lewis is “Misomythus” (“hater of myths”). This was before Lewis become a Christian and before he wrote the Chronicles of Narnia. Through their conversations and friendship Lewis came to an acknowledgement of God (albeit, intially grudgingly, “kicking and screaming” was the way Lewis put it) and ultimately a relationship with Christ.
The reason I picked Philomyth.us as the name of my blog is in reference to the thought process in Lewis’ acceptance and eventual defense of Christianity. The author of The Narnian explains how Lewis came to understand that truth was not limited to a simple description (physical or otherwise) of something. For example, water can be described as two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen. This is a true statement, however, this does not wholly describe what water is. So it is insufficient to limit truth to only what we can see, touch or even understand. Consequently, “myth” is the acknowledgement of the truth that we have yet to comprehend.
What the heck does this mean to me. Well, for those that know me, you know that I normally see things as right and wrong, good or bad, without much opening for discussion or expansion of understanding. I think what I have been learning (albeit, grudgingly) is that there is more to “truth” than what I know about it. So my desire to become a “lover of myths” (in addition to enjoying good fiction books) is a confession that I need to become better at hearing the “myths” around the truths that I assume to know. Don’t get me wrong, Truth is truth, but I can’t assume or limit my understanding of the truth to what I know or understand, and I have to open my thoughts, thinking and understanding to other voices or myths around me.
Please feel free to comment or e-mail me, because that’s the whole point of this blog, not just for me to spout my thoughts but to generate a discussion which hopefully leads to my own better understanding.
[...] Ok, I totally missed the one year anniversary for philomyth.us since my first post was on December 21 and we are just now into January. At the beginning of December, I had already planned to write something, but I figured I had plenty of time and now I’ve slipped right past it. I guess I could blame it on the fact that these past few weeks have been very busy with the holidays and everything, but anyways, here goes some reflection and review: [...]
[...] Hmm, is the term ‘mystical’ here similar to my earlier discussion of C.S. Lewis’ own reference to ‘myths’? The focus and the source all comes from an intimate relationship with Christ, and from there, both the known and the unknown are to be sought out as valuable and wondrous. [...]
[...] Well, I finally finished The Narnian: The Life and Imagination of C. S. Lewis. I posted earlier about how I was inspired to choose the domain name philomyth.us for this blog from this book and the thoughts and ideas that spoke to me. [...]
Thanks for the explanation. It makes more sense to me now.
Here’s another IM conversation that I had with Stephen:
Stephen: still not sure what the “joy” is.
Emmanuel: actually, I think I may have mis-quoted or mis-defined the reference to CS Lewis
Stephen: oh
Emmanuel: he saw it more as mystery / fantasy
Stephen: “fantasy”??
Emmanuel: well, the actual word is faerie
Emmanuel: the meaning I got out of it is more what we would think of as dreams and mystery
Emmanuel: so I applied it to the dreams and mystery of God
Stephen: hmmm….
Emmanuel: I guess one way to look at it might be the dreams that God has for us
Stephen: ic
Emmanuel: does that make more sense
Stephen: yes. it does.
Emmanuel: cool, do you mind if I post our chat to the comments
Stephen: don’t mind at all.
Stephen and I chatted on IM about this post, and he agreed to let me post it here in case it might help others to understand what I’m trying to say:
Emmanuel: there, happy now http://www.philomyth.us
Stephen: hehe…let me check it out
Emmanuel: it’s long
Stephen: i’ve got time today…don’t feel like working
Emmanuel: haha
Stephen:
Stephen: deep
Stephen: so “myth” is “the acknowledgement of the truth that we have yet to comprehend”…truths like the other descriptions of water?
Emmanuel: yeah, I was worried I was coming through
Stephen: and you want to be open to a deeper understanding of the truths you already know
Stephen: ?”coming through”?
Emmanuel: truths that that I don’t know about things that I think I know
Emmanuel: I guess I’m not being very coherent, hehe
Stephen: hmmm…
Stephen: yeah, you were coherent. i got it.
Emmanuel: cool, thanks for reading it
Stephen: yeah, np
Stephen: i think it’s good that you are being introspective
Emmanuel:
Emmanuel: kicking and screaming
Stephen: hehe…
Hey Des, thanks for commenting, never know who’s reading my “thoughts”, until there’s a comment.
As to myths, you’re right in the literal definition of myths that they are not normally taken as truths, but I think what I am understanding from CS Lewis and trying to process for myself is to not simply dismiss everything that I presume to be untrue. This is more a personal reactionary consideration in how I want to be more open to what other people are trying to share with me.
As to my tagline, the “joy” that I initially was referring to is also in reference to CS Lewis and his eventual appreciation for the “mystery” of God and the vastness of what He knows and has planned for us in comparison to what little that I know. I know that for myself, it is easy to assume I know something and consequently limit my own understanding and what God is trying to show me. More often than not, it takes a painful kick to my head or stab to the heart before I open my eyes. So, I think I’d rather change my stubborness and ignorance than to keep having to be painfully reminded of it. I think I might end up re-wording the tagline sentence, but just haven’t come up with what I really want to say.
“the truth is out there, where is the joy?” if you are refering to what I think you are, the “joy” is there too but for me, most of the time, I don’t experience it because of my indifference which is not good.
Hey Emman, welcome back! I am trying to understand what you are saying but yet confused. I appreciate the point of a “lover of myths” as being openminded but aren’t myths derived from traditions and hearsays which can taint the truth?
Yeah, it came out as I was writing it. So I guess there is a benefit to writing things out
.